CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, IC
Shankar Poddar – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: Punjab National Bank, Midnapore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of rti application (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. hearing and representation (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. limitation of information definition (Para 7 , 8) |
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 14.06.2023 seeking information on the following points:
1. Please inform me the reason for which an amount of Rs. 236/- has been debited from my account being no. ******8413 (PNB, M/s Sai Complex, INDA, OT Road, Kharagpur-721305, IFSC Code: PUNBO168710) on 03-04-2023.
2. Please inform me on which date the recipient of the account payee has submitted the A/c payee cheque in her bank. Please also inform me the aforesaid A/c payee cheque details and name of Bank, address of the payee and her account number.
3. Please inform me as to the reason MOUSUMI BISWASORD mentioned vide cheque no. 887896 & 887897 in the Savings Passbook wherein no such name is mentioned in the aforesaid Cheques.
4. Please state me if any cheque submitted by the payee to his/her Bank after validity of the same from the date of issue in that event can a Bank authority may impose a penalty in terms of cost to the sender.
If so, please supply me the relevant copy of sai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.