Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Santosh Kumar Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
PIO, Ministry of Rural Development – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application details regarding the rti seek. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dissatisfaction with cpio response led to appeal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. the role of state govt in pmay-g information. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. commission's findings on cpio's obligations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision and advice for state government approach. (Para 12 , 13) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/MORLD/A/2024/106401 Santosh Kumar Sarkar .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Rural Development, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi – 110001 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 10.07.2025 Date of Decision : 17.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 07.12.2023 CPIO replied on : 22.12.2023 First appeal filed on : 09.01.2024 First Appellate Authority’s order : 15.01.2024 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 20.02.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 07.12.2023 (online) seeking the following information:
“Sir I Santosh Kumar Sarkar, Son of Late Shri Kamini Mohan Sarkar am a senior citizen and one of the coparcener
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
