Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Savitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, LIC of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the information presented under rti was adequate. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims must be processed with required documents. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. rti responses depend on procedural compliance from the appellant. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/LICOI/A/2024/604773 Savitri devi .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, LIC of India, Divisional Office - Begusarai, Vishnu Cinema Campus, Vishwanath Nagar, Begusarai – 851101 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 16.07.2025 Date of Decision : 25.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 11.11.2023 CPIO replied on : 28.11.2023 First appeal filed on : 21.12.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : 10.01.2024 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 06.02.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 11.11.2023 (online) seeking the following information:
“According to your reply of RTI registration number LICEC/R/E/23/00160.
I submitted all the paper of claim settlement in Samastipur branch. I humble request you to please do all these process of claim settlement on priority bas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
