Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, J
Akshay Kumar Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
PIO, Bharat Electronics Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts about rti applications and responses (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dissatisfaction and escalation of rti queries (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. citations regarding transparency in public offices (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. importance of proactive information disclosure under rti act (Para 10 , 11) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 04.11.2022 (offline) seeking the following information:
“The information in the present RTI Application is related to CCTV cameras been installed by BEL under contract from PWD, GNCTD, under the GNCTD CCTV Camera Scheme.
Intent of larger public interest BEL is a public sector enterprises and have got a contract from PWD, GNCTD for installation of CCTV's as per the terms of contract for installation and maintenance of CCTV cameras in Delhi.
In turn, BEL also seems to have sub-contracted the work and paid the public money paid to various contractors for installation and maintenance of CCTV cameras in Delhi and which is a matter where larger public interest is involved in the form of proper and timely installation / maintenance / services for these CCTV's cameras, given by the contractor, as per the terms of the agreement, so as to ensu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
