SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2629

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
PRATHVIRAJ H – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Bank of Commerce – Respondent


के (cid:3)ीयसूचनाआयोग Central Information Commission बाबागंगनाथमाग(cid:18),मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नईिद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 िtiतीयअपीलसं(cid:30)ा / Second Appeal No.CIC/OBKOC/A/2018/614821 Prathviraj H … /Appellant अपीलकता(cid:8) VERSUS बनाम CPIO, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Frazer Town, Bangalore. … /Respondents (cid:9)ितवादीगण Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

RTI :25.01.2018 FA : 17.02.2018 SA : 19.03.2018
CPIO : 09.02.2018 FAO : 16.03.2018 Hearing: 11.12.2019

O R D E R

(30.12.2019)

1. The issues under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 19.03.2018 include non-receipt of the following information raised by the appellant through his RTI application dated 25.01.2018 and first appeal dated 17.02.2018: “I had filed a complaint regarding failed ATM transactions on 07.03.2017 at the Oriental Bank of commerce, Vamanjoor Branch, Mangalore and requested for CCTV footage. But the CCTV retriever who arrived on 21.03.2017 found no recordings of the disputed transactions and had reported the same to the bank. Hence, following information was required in reference of the above complaint:

(i) CCTV retrievers report dated 21.03.2017 reporting t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top