Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Raju Athinarayan Nadar – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the rti request and response by cpio. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. appellant's dissatisfaction and cpio's justification for denial. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. court's instructions regarding documentation for revealing information. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. court's directives on compliance with the order issued. (Para 8 , 9) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/CCITA/A/2024/610430 Raju Athinarayan Nadar .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), 1st Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Circle, Vadodara – 390007 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 11.08.2025 Date of Decision : 12.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 12.10.2023 CPIO replied on : 08.11.2023 First appeal filed on : 28.11.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : 21.12.2023 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 29.12.2023 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an (online) RTI application dated 12.10.2023 seeking the following information:
“Request for the income tax return for my wife Chaya Raju PAN No. ACWPJXXXX of Assessment years 2021-22, 2022-23,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
