Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Chander Gupta Maurya – Appellant
Versus
PIO, Office of the Superintendent, Central Jail No. 6, Tihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of rti application and developments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. responses noted and considered for privacy matters. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. final observation and ruling on privacy and public interest. (Para 11 , 12) |
Date of Hearing : 08.08.2025 Date of Decision : 14.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 20.08.2023 CPIO replied on : 01.09.2023, 08.09.2023, 20.09.2023, 29.09.2023, 03.10.2023.
First appeal filed on : 13.10.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : 08.11.2023 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 22.03.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 20.08.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:
“It is submitted that, I Chander Gupta Maurya (ADVOCATE), wishes to seek information under RTI act 2005 Information Required:
That is has been requested to get the information about all criminal complaints.
mention herewith:
1. Kindly Provide me the Copy of an FIR registered on Dated 09,10-June 2000 U/s 304b, 498 IPC, etc, PS Rajouri Garden, against the accused persons namely (1) Sachin kumar S/o Madan Gopal, (2) Madan gopal S/o Nanak chand, (3) Raj Rani W/
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
