CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, Information Commissioner
Bisma Hamid Qadri – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: University Grants Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification sought on ugc promotion criteria. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. absence of appellant limits contestability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. commission finds compliance by cpio adequate. (Para 6) |
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 22.04.2024 seeking information on the following points:
1) I am writing to seek clarification on the interpretation of the terms 'with Ph.D.'
and 'possessing Ph.D.' in the promotion criteria outlined by the UGC regulations. Specifically, I would like clarification on whether these qualifications are required at the time of initial appointment as Assistant Librarian/College Librarian or if they encompass individuals who have been awarded a Ph.D. after their initial appointment, irrespective of their initial qualifications.
2) I am seeking clarification regarding the promotion eligibility for individuals who pursued a Ph.D. after appointment and were awarded the degree after a specific period. Specifically, I would like to understand whether individuals appointed without a Ph.D. but who subsequently obtained the qualification during their service are entitled to retroactive promotion from the dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.