Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Subhash Batra – Appellant
Versus
PIO, Office of the Superintendent, Central Jail No. 10, Tihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of rti appeal and information sought. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of responses received and further appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. hearing details and responsibilities discussed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's final decision and rationale. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
PIO, Office of the Director General (Prisons), Prison Headquarters, Tihar, Near Lajwanti Garden Chowk, Janakpuri, New Delhi – 110064 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 08.08.2025 Date of Decision : 22.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari The above-mentioned Second Appeals are clubbed together for disposal through common order as these are based on similar RTI applications of the same applicant.
(1) CIC/CJTHR/A/2024/107975 Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 23.11.2023 CPIO replied on : 09.12.2023 First appeal filed on : 29.01.2024 First Appellate Authority’s : 12.02.2024 order
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 14.03.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 23.11.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:
“I, Subhash Batra, am in judicial custody since 18.08.2021 and lodged in Central Jail No. 2, Tihar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
