Mahesh Kumar vs PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar) - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3840

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3840

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar) – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mahesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Shri Himanshu Yadav

Table of Content
1. rti application lacked specificity. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
2. pio cross-referred inquiry to other authorities. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. commission highlighted unresolved queries and issued directives. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. advisory for transparency issued to public authorities. (Para 11 , 12)

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/GNCTD/A/2024/122333 Mahesh Kumar .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar), Old Middle School Building, Lawrence Road, Rampur, Delhi – 110035 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 04.08.2025 Date of Decision : 22.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 30.08.2023 CPIO replied on : Not On record First appeal filed on : 07.02.2024 First Appellate Authority’s order : 15.03.2024 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 13.06.2024 Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 30.08.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:

“(1) कृपया जानकार(cid:9) दे क(cid:12) सल(cid:15)न RTI application आपके काया(cid:17)लय मे जानकार(cid:9) (cid:19)ा(cid:20)त करने को लगाई थी, xxxxxx आपके (cid:27)वभाग/काया(cid:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3840

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONVinod Kumar Tiwari, ICMahesh Kumar – AppellantVersusPIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar) – Respondent

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar) – Respondent