SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3840

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mahesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Shri Himanshu Yadav

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/GNCTD/A/2024/122333 Mahesh Kumar .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, SDM (Saraswati Vihar), Old Middle School Building, Lawrence Road, Rampur, Delhi – 110035 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 04.08.2025 Date of Decision : 22.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 30.08.2023 CPIO replied on : Not On record First appeal filed on : 07.02.2024 First Appellate Authority’s order : 15.03.2024 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 13.06.2024 Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 30.08.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:

“(1) कृपया जानकार(cid:9) दे क(cid:12) सल(cid:15)न RTI application आपके काया(cid:17)लय मे जानकार(cid:9) (cid:19)ा(cid:20)त करने को लगाई थी, xxxxxx आपके (cid:27)वभाग/काया(cid:17)लय से संबि!धत थी के बारे मे जानकार(cid:9)

न देकर आपने

RTI ACT का #खलवाड़ करते हुए दसू र(cid:9) जगह *कस कारण से भेजी क(cid:12)

जानकार(cid:9) दे।

(2) कृपया जानकार(cid:9) दे क(cid:12) पुनः वह प. आपके यहाँ MCD के 0वारा transfer कर 1दया

गया। (प. सल(cid:15)न) क(cid:12) जानकार(cid:9) अब तक 3यो नह(cid:9) द(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top