Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Vipin Kumar Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, DFCCIL, New Tundla Station/EDFC – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. information on public contracts must be disclosed. (Para 2) |
| 2. denial of information without cogent reasons violates rti. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. public interest favors maximum disclosure for accountability. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. commission mandates compliance with rti regulations for transparency. (Para 12 , 14) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/DFCCI/A/2024/604379 Vipin Kumar Tyagi .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, DFCCIL, New Tundla Station/EDFC, Village - Bhakti Ghari, Tehsil -Tundla, District - Firozabad, UP – 283204 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 16.07.2025 Date of Decision : 22.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 30.10.2023 CPIO replied on : 24.11.2023 First appeal filed on : 09.12.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : Not on record
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 20.01.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 30.10.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:
“This information is being sought regarding Reinforced Earth Walls (RE Walls for brevity) for project titled as - "Two Lane R
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
