Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, IC
Sumesh Swani – Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant filed an rti application seeking information regarding disciplinary proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. the cpio provided a response outlining the nature of the requested documents and reasons for denial. (Para 2) |
| 3. subsequent appeal was filled by the appellant due to dissatisfaction with the cpio's response. (Para 3) |
| 4. the respondent provided arguments defending their decision based on exemptions under the rti act. (Para 6) |
| 5. the commission observed that the cpio's reply followed proper legal guidelines and upheld the decision. (Para 7) |
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 11.05.2024 seeking information on the following points:
Your kind attention is invited to the Advice of UPSC, communicated vide No.3/306/2022-S.I dated 06.10.2023, under the signatures of Sh. Balram Singh, Under Secretary, sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, North Block, New Delhi, in the Disciplinary Proceedings against Shri Sumesh Swani, the then Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. In this regard, kindly provide the following information & documents under the RTI Act, 2005: -
1. Certified copy of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
