Bharti Gupta vs Union Public Service Commission - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3943

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellant: None
For the Respondent: Khaling T.M

Table of Content
1. appellant sought information through rti application and received cpio response. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. faa emphasized cpio's compliance with rti timelines. (Para 4)
3. commission noted adequate information provided; appellant's absence significant. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. appeal dismissed based on findings and lack of appellant's presence. (Para 8)

Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 24.07.2024 seeking information on the following points:

1. संघ लोक सेवा आयोग ने िव৯ापन संূा 02/2010 के आइटम संূा 09 से िश঴ा

िनदेशालय, रा(cid:700)३ीय राजधानी ঴ेআ, िद(cid:671)ी के िलए 20 िश঴ा अिधकारी/सहायक िनदेशक (िश঴ा) के िलए आवेदन आमंिআत िकये थे।

क. इसम७ सामा(cid:586) ঒ेणी के उ(cid:643)ीदवार (cid:554)ारा सा঴ाਚार म७ सा঴ाਚार के अंको से कम से

कम िकतने % अंक ঋा(cid:593) करना अिनवाय१ था। (सा঴ाਚार म७ उ(cid:517)ीण१ होने के िलए)

ख. इस परी঴ा म७ मेरा अनुॿमांक 256 था मुझे िल्खत परी঴ा और सा঴ाਚार म७ िकतने

िकतने अंक ঋा(cid:593) ॽए ह॰।

2. Having not received any response from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal on 13.09.2024.

3. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 10.10.2024 and the same is reproduced as under:-

“The marks obtained by the candidate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document