Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Janardhanan Rajasekaran – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Income Tax Officer (HQ). O/o the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, VU-1, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti application filed; information sought regarding disciplinary authority's report. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's justification for denial based on rti exemptions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. the commission's reasoning against disclosure under section 8(1)(h) of the rti act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 02.01.2024 (offline) seeking the following information:
“1. Kind reference is solicited to the letter second cited. It is mentioned therein that:
"The reference (in para 5.3.2of the letter of undersigned dated 24.11.2023, addressed to you), to general examination by the erstwhile Disciplinary Authority, is from the report of the erstwhile Disciplinary Authority to ADG(Vig.) (South) Chennai which is a "confidential" document."
2. As per the provisions of section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, I request you to kindly furnish a copy of the said report of the erstwhile Disciplinary Authority made in respect of me in the Disciplinary Proceedings for which I enclose a Postal Order for Rs 10/- in No.50F 019205, dt. 02.01.2024 drawn in favour of A.O., Oo Pr.CIT(VU)-1, Coimbatore towards the application fee. I may be infor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
