Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
V S S KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, LIC of India, Salem Divisional Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. information requested pertains to third-party personal data. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. public authority's obligation to provide information under rti act. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. appellant's repetitive queries viewed as harassment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. cic cautions against misuse of rti provisions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. final decision regarding the appellant's conduct and application. (Para 16) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 03.04.2024 seeking the following information:
“QUERY -1) Give me the copies of the policies bond front page with proper attestation I have full rights to ask the copies because my personal details like my Name V S S KRISHNA and my personal Mobile No: 9790750692 are printed in the footer path of the bond copies. This policies are completed in my FSE code 0015070 only.
In my previous RTI Ref No: LICSZ/R/T/22/00006 Receipt Date: 28.02.2022 Refer the Query – 06 In this query I asked the bond front page copies for the 248 policies but the RTI and FA stage you (CPIO) and FAA both refused my request So, I filed the Case in CIC Ref No: CIC/LICOI/A/2022/630298 Receipt Dated: 01.06.2022.
On hearing, the commission
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
