Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Mr. V S S Krishna – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti application regarding employment queries. (Para 3) |
| 2. assessment of repetitive queries and their implications. (Para 10 , 13) |
| 3. commission's finding on prior responses' adequacy. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. final dismissal of the appeal due to misuse identification. (Para 14) |
3. Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 19.07.2024.
The FAA vide its order dated 12.08.2024, held as under.
“On perusing the online RTI application dated 01.06.2024, the CPIO's reply dated 20.06.2024, First appeal received online dated 19.07.2024 and the response received from the Department concerned, the appellant is informed as under:
REPLY TO QUERY:
(4) Refer Annexure 6(R) under terms & conditions point (4) Remuneration which was issued at the time of engagement of FSE Scheme. Also we have provided the Annexure 6 (R) under RTI No.LICSZ/R/2009/50002 DT. 07.01.2019 & Ref:LICOI/A/2020/693977 dated 02.09.2022. Repeated query in a new version.
(5) Copy of the letter is not available at present as replied carlier.
(6) (1) & (2) Reason is not known. The queries are interrogative in nature.
(7) Registered post only.
It is pertinent to mention here that the Appellant is a habitual informat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
