Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Deepak Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
PIO, National Law University, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant's contention regarding non-disclosure and compliance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of rti process and compliance are provided. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. upholding the pio's compliance with rti provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an (online) RTI application dated 08.02.2024 seeking the following information:
“The Reply to the information sought vide application is not appropriate and information has not been provided. Therefore the applicant once again request that proper information may please be provided in reference to the 1st Appel under the RTI act, 2005:
1. a copy of the duly certified result for the post of Deputy Registrar as advertised by the NLU Delhi (with last date of submission as 05.08.2023) may please be provided. Copy of the final result, like Minutes of Selection Committee, etc. not provided by the PIO. The University is violating the RTI Act by not declaring the result on the website. The applicant within his rights as a Candidates of the Recruitment Process fully eligible to get the information. The RTI prescribes for giving no reasons to get information.
2. a copy of selection criteria for the post of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
