Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, Information Commissioner
Santosh Bagali – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Vijayapur, Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti applications cannot seek clarifications or opinions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. first appeal upheld the cpio's response. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. findings on the absence of sufficient grounds for the appellant. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 03.07.2023 seeking information on the following points:
1. I Santosh Bagali son of late Shri SiddaramBagali and Late smtParvati (both LPA pension holders of SBI, Sindagi Branch) and brother of late Shaheed SomarayBagali (Force# 981380455, CRPF), would like to inform you that from past almost more than months' time, we have been regularly enquiring my few queries from your department. As per your information it seems you had joined this office recently and you need time to study the case. For that after we gave more than week time and even sent letter, for which we had still not received reply back from office and not even updating us how much time you need to reply back. For said reason we had sent an RTI to SBI CPPC Bangalore office, but in their reply for most of the queries, they are instructing us to contact SBI Sindagi branch office only, since CPPC came int
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
