Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, IC
Guruswamy K D – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: Canara Bank, Chikkamagalur, Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's rti application summary. (Para 1 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's defense regarding information exempt status. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. commission's decision on the appeal. (Para 6 , 9) |
ORDER
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 08.06.2024 seeking information on the following points:
SUB: request for vender 1(GURUSWAMY) statement from date 01-02-2016 to 08- 08-2024
1. You are kindly requested to provide VENDER1(GURUSWAMY) statement from date 01-02-2016 to 08-06-2024
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 06.07.2024 and the same is reproduced as under :-
“In this regard, we would like to inform you that, there is no Account number mentioned in your online application, Further with regards to statement the sought information pertains to normal banking operations and is made available through normal regular procedures to the account holders in accordance with the banking system. To obtain the sought details of the accounts / information, please contact our Kadur Branch and obtain the said information after producing valid proof of your identity.”
3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 30.07.2024 alleging that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
