Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, IC
Satyaveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Gramin Bank, Jodhpur, Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of rti application and responses. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by both parties regarding provided information. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. observations on adequacy of response. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 25.09.2024 seeking information on the following points:
1. Notional fitment chart under grant of computer increment till retirement
2. Actual received increments year wise since November 1993 to till retirement in chart.
3. Revised gratuity payment order as per last salary scale – V Satyaveer Singh Bank ID No. 3019
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 24.10.2024 and the same is reproduced as under :-
1. Your fitment of the applicant under grant of computer increment was done by concern erstwhile RRB before amalgamation of RMGB.
Due to the amalgamation of various Regional Rural Banks from time to time, the sought information is not compiled/maintained.
2. The letter regarding increment/stagnation for each year issued to you has been made available to you from time to time.
3. The sought information is not clear and specific, hence does not form Information within the provisions of Sec. 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005 .
3. Dissatisfied with the res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
