Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Praveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details on rti applications and lack of response. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. hearing details and concerns about cpio service. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court observations regarding cpio structure and transparency. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. ruling on remanding appeals for proper adjudication. (Para 17) |
| 5. advisory for staffing changes in cpio. (Para 20) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: Total 4 cases (1) CIC/SRLTI/A/2025/602924 (2) CIC/SRLTI/A/2025/603240 (3) CIC/SRLTI/A/2025/604414 (4) CIC/SRLTI/A/2025/604620 Praveen Kumar .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute, EM Bye Pass Road, PO - Panchasayar, Kolkata – 700094 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 29.10.2025 Date of Decision : 31.10.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari The above-mentioned Second Appeals are clubbed together as the parties are common, and subject-matter is similar in nature and hence, are being disposed of through a common order.
(1) CIC/SRLTI/A/2025/602924 Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 23.08.2024 CPIO replied on : Not on record First appeal filed on : 29
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
