Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Brig. Pradeep Kumar Upmanyu (Retd.) – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Assistant Registrar-(Estt.) & CPIO, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the organization of rti applications and the necessity for accurate information access. (Para 1 , 19 , 26) |
| 2. dissatisfaction with initial responses and the need for adequate communication regarding requested documents. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 3. the importance of facilitating effective inspection and cooperation for a resolution. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 4. directives for ensuring compliance with inspection and request for documents. (Para 25) |
| 5. final resolution and directives to both parties for adherence. (Para 28) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 30.06.2024 seeking the following information:
“1. I am submitting application seeking Information under the RTI Act 2005 in respect of letter No F.1(1)(55)/99/Pers-11/7124 dated 09 January 2024 issued by Shri Naveen Budhiraja Assistant Registrar (Pers-11) with the prior approval of the competent authority with subject: Release of Pension.
2 Please provide me Information under the RTI Act 2005 in respect of the letter No F.1(1)(55)/99/Pers-11/7124 dt 09 January 2024 as per the details as below:
(a) Certified copy of the complete file with all note-sheets on which approval of competent authority has b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
