Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Vijay Pal Bargujar – Appellant
Versus
PIO, O/o. the Executive Engineer-(E), PWD, Health Maintenance Electrical Division, South West, DAP Line, Vikaspuri, New Delhi-110018 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. information sought not provided, affecting public interest. (Para 2 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. mandatory proactive disclosure obligations for public authorities. (Para 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 3. judicial guidance on transparency in public contracting. (Para 12 , 14) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 03.11.2023 seeking the following information:
2. The PIO/Executive Engineer, PWD Health Maintenance Electrical Div, South-West furnished a reply to the Appellant on 12.12.2023 stating as under:
3. The PIO/Executive Engineer (Health) Central, PWD furnished a reply to the Appellant on 04.01.2024 stating as under:
4. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 26.12.2023.
The FAA order is Not on record.
5. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.
Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:
The following were present:-
Appellant: Present along with Shri Daya Ram Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar, PIO,O/o Executive Engineer, Health Maintenance Electrical Division (SW)- participated in the hearing.
6. Proof of having served a copy of Second Appeal/ Complaint on Respondent while filing the same in CIC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
