Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Kumar Saurabh – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Energy Efficiency Services Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. legal arguments on rti response inadequacy. (Para 3 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. court's observations on the cpio's compliance and response. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. rulings and principles related to promotion transparency. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decisions and compliance directions issued. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
Information sought:
“Please provide the complete information (note-sheets, correspondences etc.) regarding:
ii. is there any notification for introduction of E-7A Grade apart from EESL Promotion Policy, 2017? If yes, please provide the copy;
Sheet on that date and the copy of rule, policy under which it was done;
vi. Note-sheet of approval etc. and Rule Position under which there was non-opening of sealed envelope beyond the period of 2 Years from the Date of first DPC beginning from 01.12.2021 till 30.11.2023;
Max. Marks /Obt. Marks a. Performance Appraisal Ratings (for last 3 years) 30 ? b. Marks for Service rendered in the Grade 20 ? c. **DPC Marks 10 ? Total 60 ?
Sl. No. Parameters Maximum Max. Marks/Obt. Marks 1 Teambuilding/Leadership qualities 3 ? 2 General Conduct/Disciplinary issues in last 02 years if any3 ? 3 Award,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
