Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Sutram Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The PIO LIC of India, CRM Department Division Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption basis for rti requests. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. clarification of internal document handling. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. importance of proper service in legal processes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. affirmation of prior decisions and lack of grounds for appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final resolution and dismissal of appeal. (Para 10 , 11) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 01.01.2024 (offline) seeking the following information:
“Agency code No. 05942611-Sutram Suresh-Documents showing the approval of the Disciplinary Authority obtained on the request dated 11.12.2023 made by the presenting officer, Smt Latha B.C. A.O.(SSS), LIC of India, Bangalore-DO-1, for providing letter Ref. DO1/Mktg. dated 12.03.2018 and my reply dated 28.06.2018.”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 10.01.2024 stating as under:
“The information sought by you regarding the documents showing the approval of the Disciplinary Authority obtained on the request dated 11.12.2023, is in nature of internal documents/correspondence and held by the Public Authority in fiduciary capacity and also disclosure of such information would endanger the life or physical safety of the third party a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
