Swapan Kumar Biswas vs CPIO, Office of the Deputy Commissioner, CGST & CE

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Shri Suresh Kumar Saroj

Table of Content
1. procedural overview of rti applications. (Para 1 , 3 , 5 , 9)
2. privacy concerns related to third-party information. (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. legal provisions regarding personal information disclosure. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. final decision on the appeals. (Para 16)

Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 17.01.2024 (offline) seeking the following information:

2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 13.02.2024 stating as under:

3. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 05.03.2024.

The FAA vide its order dated 28.03.2024, upheld the reply of CPIO.

4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.

File No CIC/CCITL/A/2024/120727

Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 15.01.2024

CPIO replied on : 13.02.2024

First appeal filed on : 05.03.2024

First Appellate Authority’s order : 27.03.2024

2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 24.06.2024 Information sought:

5. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 15.01.2024 (offline) seeking the following information:

6. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 13.02.2024 stating as under:

7. Being dissatis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document