के न्द्रीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ मागग, मुननरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई निल्ली, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/NITKS/C/2024/630911 Paramjeet Singh ….निकायतकताग /Complainant VERSUS बनाम PIO, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KURUKSHETRA, DEPUTY REGISTRAR, RTI CELL, DISTT-KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA-136119 ….प्रनतवािीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 27.01.2026 Date of Decision : 28.01.2026 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Sudha Rani Relangi Relevant facts emerging from Complaint:

RTI application filed on : 11.01.2024 CPIO replied on : 01.03.2024 First appeal filed on : 22.04.2024 First Appellate Authority’s order : Nil

2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 23.05.2024 Information sought:

1. The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 11.01.2024 seeking the following information:

I am Paramjeet Singh, I apply for the Post of Technician and Sr. Technician in the various department of the Advertisement No: 03/2023. My applying detail of post of Technician and Sr. Technician of Advt No:

03/2023 is as under:

 For Technician Posts  Business Administration Application No: CNKN9106  Computer Application No: CNKN13779  Humanities Application No: CNKN11381  Computer Engg Application No: CNKNI1354  For Senior Technician Post  Computer Application No: CNKN13780  Computer Engg. Application No: CNKN9104  CCN Application No: CNKN14034 I request you please provide me the information of below points as point wise.

Point No.1:- Provide me my marks detail of written exam conducted by NTA and marks detail of skill test of the post Technician of the Department of Business Administration, Computer Application, Humanities and Computer Engg.

Point No.2:- Provide me my marks detail of written exam conducted by NTA and marks detail of skill test of the post Sr.Technician of the Department of Computer Application, Computer Engg. And CCN.

2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Complainant on 01.03.2024 stating as under:

(1) The candidate (Application No. CNKN9106) for the post of Technician in (Computer Application/Humanities/Business Administration) as per the Advt. No. 03/2023 has obtained 69 marks in common recruitment test conducted by NTA.

(2) The candidate (Application No. CNKN9104) for the post of Senior Technician in (Compüter Application) as per the Advt. No. 03/2023 has obtained 85 marks in common recruitment test conducted by NTA

3. Aggrieved by the decision of the CPIO, the Complainant filed a First Appeal dated 22.04.2024. The FAA’s order, if any, is not available on record.

4. Challenging the non-disposal of his First Appeal, Complainant is before the Commission with the instant Complaint.

Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:

The following were present:-

Complainant: Absent.

Respondent: Shri G R Sanataray, Joint Registrar-cum-CPIO along with Shri Unis Wasim, Assistant (General Admin.) present through video conference.

5. Complainant remained absent during hearing despite service.

6. Written statement of the CPIO narrating the chain of events and correspondences forwarded to the Complainant in this matter, is taken on record.

7. CPIO apprised the Bench that a Second Appeal of the Complainant on the same RTI application was already hearing and decided by the Commission vide case File No. CIC/NITKS/A/2024/624455 on 25.06.2025 upholding the decision of the CPIO. There was no denial of information from their side.

Decision:

8. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case and perusal of the records noted that this case is a complaint filed under Section 18(2) the RTI Act, 2005 where no further direction for disclosure of information can be given in the light of the judgement decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Information Commissioner and another Vs. State of Manipur & Another reported in MANU/SC/1484/2011: AIR 2012 SC 864.The role of CIC is restricted only to ascertain if the information has been denied with a mala-fide intention or due to an unreasonable cause.

9. On going through the case re