Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Swagat Das, INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
Vivek – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Northern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti sought for pc act sanction files in ongoing cbi case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties reiterate exemption claims under rti sections 8(1)(g), (j). (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. pending trial justifies denying information to avoid impeding prosecution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. superior courts affirm rti exemptions for vigilance/investigation documents. (Para 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. appeal dismissed upholding cpio/faa denial. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 03.05.2024 (online) seeking the following information:
“Applicant is accused in criminal case no. PC/8/2022, which is under progress at Special CBI Court, Panchkula. Sanction to prosecute the applicant in court of law was granted by an official in Ministry of Railway in response to CBI/ACB Chandigarh letter no.859/RC0052022A0022 dated 06.09.2022. The letter quoted in RTI application has already been received by applicant in compliance to Special CBI court orders. It may please be noted that investigation in the said case is complete as final charge sheet under Section 173(2) CRPC has been filed by CBI in court of law on 12/9/2022.
In connection with above under RTI Act ki
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
