Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Arjun Singh – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Office of the Income Tax officer, Ward No. 1(3)(4), ITO Building, 16, Civil Lines, Roorkee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti application filed seeking internal information. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. cpio's obligation towards applicants and legal interpretation. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court acknowledges the appropriateness of cpio's response. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 26.02.2024 (offline) seeking the following information:
“1. Please provide me with a certified copy of the office order or direction to open the Income Tax Office in Roorkee on January 13 and 14, 2024.
2. Please inform me of the provision(s) of the RTI Act, 2005, in which the receipt and dispatch register showing dates of letters received and sent, respectively, are subject to safety, privacy, and confidentiality and kept in a fiduciary capacity.
3. Please inform me of the provision(s) of the RTI Act, 2005, under which the definition of "sub-judice" matters is given.
4. Please inform me of the provision(s) of the RTI Act, 2005, under which providing information about "sub-judice" matters is barred or restricted.
5. Please provide me with a certified copy of the order or direction given by the judiciary, higher authorities, or tribunal restricting your power to provide information in con
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
