Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
P R Ramesh, Commissioner
Manoj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: Unique Identification Authority of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti request for own aadhaar details and subsidies denied (Para 1) |
| 2. procedures for aadhaar access and authentication provided (Para 2) |
| 3. legal heir rti for deceased's aadhaar rejected (Para 3) |
| 4. parties reiterate positions on information access (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. aadhaar data confidential under section 28(5) (Para 6) |
| 6. cpio responses upheld; no rti intervention needed (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
Second Appeal No. CIC/UIDAI/A/2024/140644
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 21.08.2024 seeking information on the following points:
A) Kindly provide me the certified copy by post/hand/online of the following: 1) Aadhaar No. 3273XXXXX of myself i.e. Manoj Sharma S/o Balkrishan Sharma, 2) Aadhaar registration form with all supporting documents as submitted by Aadhaar Holder on getting himself registered for said Aadhaar Number, B) Kindly also provide me the detail information of government subsidy/facility name, amount and date when the said Aadhaar No. is used and utilized for any such government subsides/facilities till date.
1.1. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 05.09.2024 and the same is reproduced as under :-
1.2. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
