Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Anubhav Khanna – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for personal information on third-party employee. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. first appellate authority's ruling regarding personal information. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. compliance with faa’s order is mandatory. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. decision to disclose salary but protect other personal info. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 19.03.2024 (online) seeking the following information:
“This information is required in context of Sanjiv D. P. Azad (Emp ID- 8930) who belongs to IRS-CBIC service and is presently employed as Assistant Director, NACIN, Chandigarh. His niece Prerna has filed a FIR of 498 A against me and my aged parents and according to law I am entitled to this information as according to the information received, her parents have made an expense of Rs. 65 lacs in the marriage as claimed by them in the FIR.
1. Annual movable property returns (cash/jewelry/cars etc.) filed by him till date. (Relevant decision of CIC dated 20 March,2008 No. CIC/OK/A/2007/01493 & CIC/OK/A/2008/00027 regarding providing such information to public is attached for ready reference). He is bound to do this declaration according to The All-Indi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
