SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3263

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Dayashankar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA) Patna – Respondent
CIC/CCAPT/A/2024/114352



के (cid:3)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:18), मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/DGSTX/A/2024/627792 Sharad Tripathi .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, Chinarr Incube Business Centre, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal – 462026 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 16.02.2026 Date of Decision : 09.03.2026 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 02.11.2023 CPIO replied on : 24.11.2023 First appeal filed on : 06.12.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : 01.04.2023 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 26.06.2024 Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 02.11.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:

“Details of rewards sanctioned by the DGGI, Zonal Unit, Bhopal, during July, 2020 to 02.11.2023. In case the information is readily not available, copy of the reward register maintained for this purpose may be provided.

a. Details of rewards sanctioned to the officers in following format.

Sr. No. Party's name and address Date of finalization of case Date of submission of reward proposal Reward order No. Date of meeting held for sanction of reward Members of the meeting (names)

b. Details of rewards sanctioned to the informers in following format.

Sr. No. Party's name and address Date of finalization of case Date of submission of reward proposal Reward order No. Date of meeting held for sanction of reward Members of the meeting (names)

c. Details of reward proposals pending for sanction as on date, to the officers in following format.

Sr. No. Party's name and address Date of submission of reward proposal Date of finalization of case
d. Details of reward proposals pending for sanction as on date, to the informer in following format.

Sr. No. Party's name and address Date of submission of reward proposal Date of finalization of case

2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 24.11.2023 stating as under:

“Please refer to your RTI application dated 02.11.2023 bearing receipt no. 5717812 and enclosing Indian Postal Order no. 62F101053 filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005 received in this office on

02.11.2023.

In this regard, it is to apprise that information sought vide your application dated 02.11.2023 can't be provided as it is falling under exemption from disclosure under following sections of the RTI act 2005: - Section 8(1)(d) information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party. unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information, Section 8(1)(e) information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information, Section 8(1)(g) information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes &

Section 8(1)(j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information.”

3. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 06.12.2023.

The FAA vide its order dated 01.04.2023, upheld the reply of CPIO.

4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top