CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
HASANUJ JAMAN BARBHUIYA – Appellant
Versus
Assam University – Respondent
CIC/ASUVR/A/2025/116276
##PAGE1##
के (cid:574)ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:330), मुिनरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
नई िद(cid:671)ी, New Delhi – 110067
File No: CIC/UODEL/A/2025/622918
Deepak Kapoor .….अपीलकता(cid:330)/Appellant
VERSUS
बनाम
The CPIO
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI,
RTI CELL, DELHI -110007 ….(cid:366)ितवादीगण /Respondent
Date of Hearing : 05.03.2026
Date of Decision : 05.03.2026
INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Sudha Rani Relangi
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 17.03.2025
CPIO replied on : 15.04.2025
First appeal filed on : 15.04.2025
First Appellate Authority’s order : 09.05.2025
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 21.05.2025
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 17.03.2025 seeking the
following information:
“1. please provide the result vide advertisement Estab.IV/297/2023
dated 09.08.2023 for the post of Deputy Registrar
2. please provide the marks list of written test for the post of DR against
the advt Estab.IV/297/2023 dated 09.08.2023.
3. please provide the marks list of interview for the post of DR against
the advt Estab.IV/297/2023 dated 09.08.2023..
Page 1 of 7
1 / 8
##PAGE2##4. please provide the minutes of selection committee for the post of DR
against the advt Estab.IV/297/2023 dated 09.08.2023.
5. please provide the list of waitlisted candidates for the post of DR
against the advt Estab.IV/297/2023 dated 09.08.2023.”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 15.04.2025 stating as
under:
“The information sought by the applicant was endorsed to the Assistant
Registrar (Recruitment) of the University, who is the deemed PIO under
section 5(4) & 5(5) of the Act.
Any relevant input is yet to be received from the Assistant Registrar
(Recruitment), the concerned deemed PIO as per section 5(4) of the RTI
Act. The matter is being pursued further with the Deputy Registrar
(Recruitment). The applicant may contact the Deputy Registrar
(Recruitment)/Section Officer (R&P) on telephone nos. 011-
27662021/011-27001164 (email id - ar_rec@admin.du.ac.in) in this
regard.”
3. Aggrieved by the decision of the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal
dated 15.04.2025. The FAA vide its order dated 09.05.2025, upheld the reply of
CPIO.
4. Challenging the FAA’s order, Appellant is before the Commission with
the instant Second Appeal on the following grounds-
“B. Grounds for Second Appeal:
1. Misinterpretation of Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, 2023:
& on 21.04.202o Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act cannot override the mandate
of the RTI Act, 2005. The Right to Information is a fundamental right under
Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and requires Parliament’s approval and
President’s ascent for any amendment in view any other act’s overriding
effect.
o The RTI Act is a special legislation that allows disclosure of personal
information if there is a larger public interest, which has been upheld in a
number of judgements. Moreover, the RTI Act has not been repealed or
explicitly overridden by the DPDP Act.
o Section 22 of the RTI Act clearly states that its provisions shall have
overriding effect over any other law in force, including the DPDP Act.
2. Judicial Precedent on Disclosure of Marks:
o In CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay, (2011) 8 SCC 497, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court held that evaluated answer sheets, marks obtained, and other selection
Page 2 of 7
2 / 8
##PAGE3##data in public examinations and recruitments cannot be classified as personal
information when larger public interest is involved.
o Similarly, in UPSC v. Angesh Kumar, Civil Appeal No. 6159 of 2013, the Apex
Court reiterated that in recruitment to public posts, the disclosure of marks to
candidates and public is permissible.
3. Public Interest and Transparency in Public Recruitment:
o Information such as marks of written test and interview, waitlist details, and
Selection Committee names is central to ensuring transparency and fairness in
public recruitment processes. Moreover, the fact that the Appellant himself
was a candidate in the recruitment process.
o The information sought d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.