2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3342
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
PRAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) – Respondent
CIC/NHAIN/A/2024/138923
##PAGE1##
के (cid:574)ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:330), मुिनरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
नई िद(cid:671)ी, New Delhi – 110067
File No: CIC/ITILT/A/2024/654282
Gangaraj S .….अपीलकता(cid:330)/Appellant
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO
ITI Limited, ITI Bhavan,
Corporate Office,
Dooravaninagar, Bangalore -
560016 ….(cid:366)ितवादीगण /Respondent
Date of Hearing : 05.03.2026
Date of Decision : 05.03.2026
INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Jaya Varma Sinha
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 24.08.2024
CPIO replied on : 24.09.2024
First appeal filed on : 01.10.2024
First Appellate Authority’s order : 08.11.2024
2nd Appeal dated : 03.12.2024
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 24.08.2024(online) seeking
the following information:
“Please furnish the following information under the Right to Information Act,
2005, in regard to the contracts entered into from 1997 to 2024
CIC/ITILT/A/2024/654282 Page 1 of 6
1 / 7
##PAGE2##1. Copies of agreements and contract entered into with contractors for the
period 1997 to 2024
2. List of contract workers working in ITI from 2022 to 2024 long with details of
date of joining and designation
3. All returns filed under the Contract Labour Act, Payment of Wages Act and
the Minimum Wages Act by M/s ITI Ltd.
4. Inspection of all related files”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 24.09.2024 stating as
under:
“This is with reference to your offline RTI application vide Dated: 24.08.2024,
received in CPIO Office on 26.08.2024 via India Post. Please find below the reply
to your queries (Q.No. 1, Q.No. 2. Q.No. 3 & Q.No. 4), which is regarding the
contract from 1997 to 2024.
"Information sought is exempted from disclosure in accordance with section
8(1) (J) and 8(1) (d) of the RTI Act, 2005."
3. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 01.10.2024. The
FAA vide its order dated 08.11.2024, held as under:
“After careful consideration and thorough examination of your request, we
would like to inform you that the response provided by the Central Public
Information Officer (CPIO), ITI Limited are valid and are in accordance with the
provisions of the RTI Act.
Hence in view of the above your RTI Appeal has been disposed.”
4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Commission
with the instant Second Appeal.
Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:
The following were present:-
Appellant: Present through VC.
Respondent: Shri Shashikant Tanaji Pawar, CPIO-cum-AGM, attended the
hearing through VC.
5. The Appellant stated that the Respondent has not provided the relevant
information as sought in the instant RTI Application.
CIC/ITILT/A/2024/654282 Page 2 of 6
2 / 7
##PAGE3##6. The Respondent submitted that the information sought by the Appellant
in the instant RTI Application contains personal information of third-party
contractors, individual workers, statutory compliance records and
industrial dispute proceedings presently pending adjudication before the
Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), Bengaluru. Information
regarding contract agreements executed with contractors contain
detailed commercial and technical terms including financial quotations
and pricing structures, technical specifications, Scope of work and
deployment patterns and Operational and manpower details. These
agreements involve third-party commercial interests and disclosure
would adversely affect the competitive position of the contractors as well
as the tendering process of the Respondent CPIO organization. Therefore,
the information is exempted under Section 8 (1) (d) & (j) of the RTI Act,
2005.
7. A written submission has been received from Shri Shashikant Tanaji
Pawar, CPIO-cum-AGM, vide letter dated 25.02.2026, stating as under:
“2. The applicant, Mr. Gangaraj S, submitted an offline RTI application dated
24.08.2024, which was received by the CPIO through offline mode (Annexure-
02). The said application was received in the office of the CPIO on 26.08.2024,
and a reply was issued on 24.09.20