Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
SANJEEV KUMAR JINDAL, Information Commissioner
Unnikrishnan P K – Appellant
Versus
The CPIO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti application details and cpio's point-wise reply with exemptions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. first appeal returned due to improper authority. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. hearing facts, respondent defense, background inquiries. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. upholding rti denials, appeal disposed without intervention. (Para 9) |
order
Second Appeal dated : 24.09.2024
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application on 17.06.2024 seeking the following information:
“Request for information under section 6(1) of RTI Act
Subject matter of information :- The Chairman Local Board Administration of Sainik School KZM , Air Vice Marshal BV Upadhyay, Senior Officer in Charge Administration , HQ SAC, IAF had submitted a report to the Sainik School Society,Min of Def ,New Delhi vide letter No.SAC/3375/1/EDN dated 16 Jan 2023 after conducted a Inquiry into the allegation of " Major Financial irregularities complaint levelled against Sainik School Kazhakootam vide Government of India ,Sainik School Society ,Min of Def, New Delhi -11 vide letter No. 29(2)/2021/D(SSC) dated 16 Dec 2022 vide which Central Vigilance Commission OM No.206406/2022/Vigilance-09 dated 16 Nov 2022 The Sainik School which is a CB
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
