SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 5303

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Rakesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Directorate General of Vigilance – Respondent
CIC/DGVCE/A/2024/656112



##PAGE1##

के(cid:7008)(cid:7076)ीय सूचना आयोग

Central Information Commission

बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:6981),मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka

नई (cid:7408)द(cid:7016)ली, New Delhi – 110067

ि(cid:554)तीय अपील संূा / Second Appeal No.CIC/DIRED/A/2024/647523

Kulwant Singh … अपीलकता१/Appellant

VERSUS

बनाम

CPIO

Education Department

GNCTD …(cid:7079)ितवादीगण/Respondent

Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

RTI : 26.08.2024 FA : 26.09.2024 SA : 28.10.2024

CPIO : 23.09.2024 FAO : 16.10.2024 Hearing : 16.04.2026

Date of Decision: 20.04.2026

CORAM

Chief Information Commissioner: RAJ KUMAR GOYAL

O R D E R

1. The Appellant filed an RTI Application dated 26.08.2024, before the CPIO,

Education Department, GNCTD, seeking information as under:

“O.B.C (N.C.L) CANDIDATE SELECTED UNDER ORDER NO:DE.2(8)(33)/E-

II/DR/ENG/16/384 AGAINST POST CODE 168/2014 DATED:27/01/2017

Page 1 of 6 Second Appeal No.

CIC/DIRED/A/2024/647523

1 / 7

##PAGE2##

SUPPLY COPY OF VERIFICATION REPORT AND FILE NOTINGS OF CASTE

CERTIFICATE O.B.C (N.C.L) ISSUED BY THE SDM PATEL NAGAR WEST DISTRICT

OF SWATI CHAUDHARY PGT ENGLISH S.V JAIDEV PARK EMPLOYEE ID 20170739

SUPPLY CERTIFIED COPY OF CASTE CERTIFICATE

SUPPLY INFORMATION OF CRIMINAL RECORDS AND PENDING CASES

AGAINST SWATI CHAUDHARY PGT ENGLISH EMP ID 20170739”

2. The Appellant received a reply on 23.09.2024 through the RTI online portal as

under:

“RTI application has been forwarded to concerned HOS (being APIO) under Zone-

15 with the directions to supply the information under RTI ACT directly to the applicant.”

3. The Principal, Sarvodaya Co-Ed Sr. Sec. School, Jaidev Park, New Delhi addressed

the DDE, Zone 15, Karampura, vide letter dated 24.09.2024, stating in respect of the

instant RTI Application that the same is not related to their department, which is also

placed on record.

4. Subsequently, the Appellant filed a First Appeal on 26.09.2024 before the FAA

reiterating the RTI queries. The FAA/RDE (West) vide order dated 16.10.2024 held as

under:

“In response to above notice, PIO/DDE (Zone-15) has submitted vide letter No.

1086 dated 05.10.24 that the RTI application had been transferred to concerned HOS

(being APIO), further the APIO (HOS, S.V., Jaidev Park 1515001) has replied to the

applicant vide Ref. No. SV/JDP/2024/551 dated 24/09/2024.

After going through the RTI appeal and submissions made by the appellant, it

appears that the information sought is exempted from disclosure under Section 11 of the

Act. It is a settled fact that the copy of Caste Certificate of a third party is personal

information of that third party" as per CIC order in Madhu Vs PIO and Sr. DMM, DRM

Page 2 of 6 Second Appeal No.

CIC/DIRED/A/2024/647523

2 / 7

##PAGE3##

Office, Northern Railways dated 05/12/2017. The Appellant did not provide any cogent

reason to demonstrate the involvement of a larger public interest in the case.”

5. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with

the instant Second Appeal on 28.10.2024, urging that the information pertains to a public

record and relying upon earlier decisions of CIC on related subject matter.

Hearing Proceedings & Decision

6. The Appellant was present during the hearing in person. On behalf of the

Respondent, Praveen Kumar Kalra, CPIO & DDE (West) along with Vinod Kumar,

Principal, S.V JAIDEV Park attended the hearing in person.

7. The Appellant stated that he has sought to ascertain the veracity of the caste

reservation benefit availed by the averred employee of the School. In addition to the CIC

decisions relied upon in his grounds of second appeal relating to 2009, the Appellant

sought to rely on a recent CIC decision dated 15.04.2025 in File No.

CIC/NGTRI/A/2023/65326. Upon a query from the Commission, the Appellant affirmed

that he is not related to the averred employee in any manner.

8. The Respondent relied upon the decision of the FAA to state that the information

sought pertains to the personal information of a third party. Further, the Commission took

on record the written submissions dated 15.04.2026 filed by the CPIO, whe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top