2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6149
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
MOHD AZAM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
CIC/MHOME/A/2024/645781
##PAGE1##
के(cid:7008)(cid:7076)ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:6981),मुिनरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
नई (cid:7408)द(cid:7016)ली, New Delhi – 110067
ि(cid:554)तीय अपील संূा / Second Appeal No. CIC/CPVEX/A/2024/645055
Parul Nahar … अपीलकता१/Appellant
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO
Regional Passport Office
Kota, Rajasthan
…(cid:7079)ितवादीगण/Respondent
Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:
RTI : 23.08.2024 FA : 12.09.2024 SA : 10.10.2024
CPIO : 12.09.2024 FAO : 07.10.2024 Hearing : 05.05.2026
Date of Decision: 05.05.2026
CORAM
Chief Information Commissioner: RAJ KUMAR GOYAL
O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 23.08.2024, before the CPIO, MEA -
Consular, Passport & Visa Division (CPV), seeking information as under:
“I have applied for the passport reissue of my minor daughter via File No.
KT2076324582924 on 4th March 2024.
Annex C was submitted along with the application since custody of my minor
daughter is with me as the biological mother and the biological father (who has visitation
rights) is refusing to give the consent. The divorce was with mutual consent.
Page 1 of 6 Second Appeal No.
CIC/CPVEX/A/2024/645055
1 / 7
##PAGE2##However, still there is a sole objection letter issued with Reference No.
OBJ/317710363/24 dated 19 Apr 2024 asking to submit the consent of biological father
and the passport has not been issued till date. There is no other objection raised or
additional document requested.
I request the Passport Office to please review the application and advise:
1. Why passport is not being issued as per provisions of Annex C Paragraph II (b)
and Paragraph III which specifically applies when legal custody of the minor daughter is
with the mother who is applying for the passport and father (with visitation rights) is
wilfully not giving the consent.
2. As per Chapter 4/Section 4.4 of the passport guideline manual available on the
department website, children also have a fundamental right to travel and the other parent
cannot willfully prevent them from travelling abroad. Pls advise why this fundamental
right is being ignored while reviewing the passport application of my minor daughter.
3. Further, as per Chapter 4/Section 4.5 of the manual, where one of the parent
willfully refuses to give consent and thus denying the fundamental right of the children to
travel, passport may be issued to the child after receipt of affidavit in the form of Annex C
obtained from the parent having the custody of the child. Pls advise why this provision is
not being applied for my daughter passport application.
I further state that custody of my daughter is with me and issuance of a passport to
her is for her future education abroad and for her best welfare, visitation rights of the
father are not affected in any way by grant of a passport to my daughter.
I, as the mother of the child, is running pillar to post to get the passport issued,
while the father who himself stays out of India is willfully preventing the issuance of the
passport.
I sincerely request the passport department again to please process the passport
application of my daughter as soon as possible.”
Page 2 of 6 Second Appeal No.
CIC/CPVEX/A/2024/645055
2 / 7
##PAGE3##2. The CPIO replied to the RTI Application on 12.09.2024, as under:
“Passport application KT2076324582924 of your daughter Vanisha Nainawatee is
under process. Response of objection letter OBJ/317710363/24 is awaited. You can take
appointment for enquiry at RPO Kota for further query.”
3. Dissatisfied with the reply of the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal on
12.09.2024. The FAA vide order dated 07.10.2024 held as under:
“Passport application KT2076324582924 of your daughter Vanisha Nainawatee is
under process. Response of objection letter OBJ/317710363/24 is awaited. Divorce paper
has been rechecked and hence father's consent on Annexure D is mandatory.”
4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with
the instant Second Appeal on 10.10.2024, inter alia stating as under:
“I request the re