SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6613

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
P R Ramesh
Priyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Unique Identification Authority of India – Respondent
CIC/UIDAI/A/2025/607007 | CIC/UIDAI/A/2025/616249



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Dharmveer Kushwaha

Demographic details and supporting documents of an individual's Aadhaar records are personal information protected under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and the confidentiality provisions of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and cannot be disclosed to a third party without a court order.

Headnote:(A) Right to Information Act, 2005 - Section 8(1)(j) - Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 - Sections 28, 29 and 33 - Disclosure of third-party Aadhaar details - Information sought pertains to demographic details and documents submitted by a third party for updation of Aadhaar records - Such information is personal in nature and protected - Disclosure of Aadhaar-related information governed by specific statutory provisions - Mere personal grievance or private dispute cannot be a ground for disclosure of third-party personal information.

Facts of the case:
The Appellant filed multiple RTI applications seeking documents and demographic details of a third party's Aadhaar records (relationship status/name change). The CPIO and First Appellate Authority denied the information citing confidentiality provisions of the Aadhaar Act and the exemption under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. The Appellant appealed to the Commission.

Findings of Court:
The Commission held that the requested information relates to third-party personal data, which is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. Furthermore, the Aadhaar Act mandates confidentiality of demographic and biometric information, allowing disclosure only under specific judicial orders as per Section 33.

Issues: Whether the demographic details and documents submitted by a third party for Aadhaar updation can be disclosed under the Right to Information Act.

Ratio Decidendi: Aadhaar-related demographic and biometric information of an individual is personal data protected by law; disclosure of such information in the absence of a competent court order is prohibited to maintain privacy and security.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural background and rti application details regarding third-party information. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties' contentions regarding access to personal aadhaar data. (Para 3 , 4)
3. application of statutory confidentiality provisions and the privacy exemption under the rti act. (Para 5)

Relevant dates emerging from the appeal(s):

Sl. No. Second Appeal No. Date of RTI Application Date of CPIO’s Reply Date of First Appeal Date of FAA’s Order Date of Second Appeal
1. 607007 22.04.2024 15.05.2024 11.06.2024 18.06.2024 08.02.2025
2. 616249 22.01.2025 29.01.2025 04.02.2025 10.02.2025 07.04.2025

The instant set of appeals have been clubbed for decision as these relate to similar RTI Applications and same subject matter.

Date of Hearing: 18.05.2026

Date of Decision: 21.05.2026

CORAM:

Hon’ble Commissioner

Shri P R Ramesh

O R D E R

Second Appeal No. CIC/UIDAI/A/2025/607007

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 22.04.2024 seeking information on the following points:

1. Name of Document uploaded for updation of relationship status for Adhar no. xxxx0895821 by Swati Thakur i.e. my husband (Nitin Yadav) name replacing her father(Jagannath Singh) name.

2. Certified copy of Document uploaded for updation of relationship status for Adhar no. xxxx895821 by Swati Thakur i.e. my husband (Nitin Yadav) replacing her father(Jagannath Singh) name.

3. Demographic details of QR code decoding showing C/o-D/o or W/o of previous and updated adhar by Swati Thakur

1.1. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 15.05.2024 and the same is reproduced as under :-

आपको सूिचत िकया जाता हैिक, आपके ारा िकसी अ के आधार से संिधत जानकारी चाही गयी हैजो की आधार अिधिनयम, 2016 िक धारा 28 व 29 एवं धारा 33 के अनुसार (िवीय और अ सहाियिकयों, मुिवधाओंऔर सेवाओंका लत परदान) आधार कायम के तहत नामांिकत का जनसांकीय और बॉयोमीिटक डेटा बॉयोमीिटक डेटा कृ ित मगोपनीय है, इसिलए इसेदान नहीं िकया जा सकता है। है। तथा सूचना का अिधकार अिधिनयम 2005 की धारा 8(1) (जे) के अनुसार जनसांकीय और बायोमेिटक डाटा (िनवासी का गत डाटा) की गोपनीय कृ ित को ान मरखतेए के वल िनवासी िजससेडाटा संबंिधत हैसूचना मांग सकता है। कोई अ आवेदक यह सूचना नहींमांग सकता है। िकसी अ ाथ को तीसरी िकसी पाट या िकसी अ िनवासी सेसंबंिधत िकसी गत सूचना को नहीं िदया जाएगा तािक आधार कायम के तहत नामांिकत िनवासी की िनजता सुरित और गोपनीय बनी रहे। इसकी जानकारी ािधकरण की वेबसाइट िलंक : https://uidai.gov.in/about-uidai/right-to-information.html पर भी उपल है।

Further, as per Section 33(1) of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 as amended by the Aadhaar and Other Laws (Amendment) Act 2019 dated 24/07/2019, any disclosure of information (other than core biometric information), including identity information or authentication records can be made pursuant to an order of a court not inferior to that of a Judge of a High Court after giving opportunity of hearing to both UIDAI and the concerned Aadhaar number holder.

Also, the Supreme Court vide its Judgement dated 26/09/2018 in WP (C) 494 of 2012 and connected cases had clarified that an individual, whose information is sought to be released, shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing. If such an order is passed, in that eventuality, he shall also have right to challenge such an order passed by approaching the higher court. During the hearing before the concerned court, the said individual can always object to the disclosure of information on accepted grounds in law, including Article 20(3) of the Constitution or the privacy rights etc.

1.2. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 11.06.2024 alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 18.06.2024 observed as under.

2. ाथ ारा पूवमकेीय जनसूचना अिधकारी से माँगी गई सूचना एवं ािधकरण के केीय जनसूचना अिधकारी ारा उे िदए गए जवाब के अवलोकन से यह तीत होता है िक, केीय जनसूचना अिधकारी ारा िदया गया जवाब आर. टी. आई. अिधिनयम, 2005 के िनयमों के अनुप है। अतः थम अपीलीय अिधकारी इस

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top