केन्द्रीय सचू ना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गगं नाथ माग,ग मनु नरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई दिल्ली, New Delhi – 110067 नितीय अपील संख्या / Second Appeal No. CIC/CALHC/A/2024/601395 Smt. SUTAPA BHATTACHARYYA … अपीलकता/ग Appellant VERSUS/बनाम PIO, …प्रनतवािीगण /Respondent Calcutta High Court Date of Hearing : 04.02.2025 Date of Decision : 04.02.2025 Chief Information Commissioner : Shri Heeralal Samariya Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 03.09.2023 PIO replied on : - -

First Appeal filed on : Nil First Appellate Order on : - -

2ndAppeal/complaint received on : 09.01.2024 Information sought and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 03.09.2023 seeking information on following points:-

“With respect to the Notification No. 3096-G-dated the 16th December, 2021, of Honourable Calcutta High court, regarding the Rules for online electronic filing (e-Filing). framed by the Honourable Calcutta High Court (copy attached as Annex 1), the following information are hereby requested:-

(1) Being an Indian citizen and resident of West Bengal state, whether I am eligible to electronically file fresh/new cases of writ of mandamus/habeas corpus or file an Appeal against the order of lower court as Litigant-in-person in accordance to the Rule-3.2 at page-125, of electronic filing (e-Filing) rules of Honourable Calcutta High Court?

(2) In the aforesaid notification No. 3096-G-dated the 16th December, 2021, of Honourable Calcutta High court, at page-131, details of necessary procedures related to electronic filing (e-Filing) of cases is mentioned to be given in Appendix- I to VI, but the Appendix documents are not available with the notification. Please provide me web-link from where the Appendix documents can be accessed.

(3) Please provide me the information regarding total court fee required for electronic filing (e-Filing) of fresh/new cases and cases of Appeal before Honourable Calcutta High court.

Dissatisfied with the non-0response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated Nil which was not adjudicated by the FAA as per available records.

Aggrieved and dissatisfied, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.

Facts emerging in Course of Hearing:

Appellant: Absent Respondent: Shri Sukanto Chakraborty, Adv The Submissions were heard.

Decision:

Upon the perusal of the case records & submissions, the Commission noted that the CPIO had provided an appropriate reply to the Appellant vide letter dated 30.1.2024 & 31.1.2024. No further action lies.

The Appeal stands disposed off.

Heeralal Samariya (हीरालाल सामररया

Chief Information Commissioner (मख्ु य सचू ना आयक्तु )

Authenticated true copy अनिप्रमानणत सत्यानपत प्रनत ( )

S. K. Chitkara (एस के नचटकारा)

. .

Dy. Registrar (उप - पंजीयक)

011-26186535 Recomendation(s) to PA under section 25(5) of the RTI Act, 2005:-

Nil