SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 8401

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Rekha – Appellant
Versus
GNCTD – Respondent
CIC/GNCTD/A/2024/103128



के (cid:3)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:18), मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/GNCTD/A/2024/103128 Rekha .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, O/o the Principal District &

Sessions Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Court, Delhi – 110092 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 28.05.2025 Date of Decision : 24.06.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 09.10.2023 CPIO replied on : 17.11.2023 First appeal filed on : 06.12.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : Not on record

2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 31.01.2024 Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 09.10.2023 seeking the following information:

“1. Please provide the investigation report with certified copy of the documents in suit no. 412/2023 Rakha V/s Sh. Ram Pal Singh L.I.C. Agent B-

241, Salimar Garden, U. P. Copy enclosed Annexure A

2 Please provide the certified copy of the Cheque No. 813447 dated 19.12.2014 State Bank of India New Delhi Rs. 500000/-

3. Please provide the certified copy of the Cheque No. 813449 dated

21.03.2015 State Bank of India, New Delhi Rs. 500000/-

4. Please provide the certified copy of the Cheque No. 667386 dated

11.07.2022 Canara Bank New Delhi Rs. 10000/-

5. Please provide the certified copy of the Receipt of Sarvotam Hi Tech Infra Developers Limited.

6. Please provide the certified copy of the Bank Receipt of PNB Dilshad Garden Delhi where Cheque No. 813447 dated 19.12.2014 Rs. 50000//deposited by Sh.

Rampal Singh L.I.C. Agent on 20.12.2014.

7. Please provide the certified copy of the Bank Receipt of PNB Sansad Marg New Delhi where cheque No. 813449 dated 21.03.2015 Rs. 500000/- deposited by Sh. Rampal Singh L.I.C. Agent on 23.03.2015.

8. Please provide the LI.C. No. of Sh. Ram Pal Singh L.I.C. Agent R/o B-241 Shalimar Garden U. P.

9. Please provide the L.I.C. No. of Smt. Kusum Lata W/o Sh. Ram Pal Singh L.I.C.

Agent R/o B-241, Shalimar Garden, U. P.

10. Please provide office address of Sarvotam Hi Tech Infra Developers Limited Company in Delhi/Ghaziabad, U. P.

11. Please provide the written statement of Sh. Ram Pal Singh L.I.C. Agent B-

241, Shalimar Garden, U. P.

12. Please provide the written statement of Smt. Kusum Lata L.I.C. Agent B-

241, Shalimar Garden, U. P”

2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 17.11.2023 stating as under:

“This is in response to your RTI application received on dated 19/10/2023 for seeking information under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this regard, this is to inform you that the information has been collected from the concerned court/branch of Shahdara District, U/s 6(1) (A) of RTI Act 2005, consisting of 01 page, which is self explanatory. Therefore, the duly stamped photocopy of the information is being sent to you.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

Encl. dated 16.11.2023 is as under:

With reference to your letter ID No. as above, it is submitted that applicant is seeking copies of documents, hence, he/she may be asked to move CA application for the same is she/he is a party in the case.”

3. Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 06.12.2023.

The FAA order is Not on record.

4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.

Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:

The following were present:-

Appellant: Absent.

Respondent: Shri Shailender Sharma, PIO-cum-Senior Judicial Assistant and Ms. Mamta Dhawan, Dealing Assistant (RTI Branch), attended the hearing in person.

5. The Appellant did not participate in the hearing.

6. The respondent submitted that a suitable reply in terms of the provisions of the RTI Act has been given to the Appellant vide letter dated 17.11.2023. He further reiterated the contents of his written submission.

7. A written submission has been received from Shri Shailender Sharma, PIO-cum-Senior Judicial Assistant, v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top