SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9073

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Naresh Kadyan – Appellant
Versus
University Grants Commission – Respondent
CIC/UGCOM/C/2024/624317



के (cid:574)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग१,मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:671)ी, New Delhi – 110067 िशकायत संূा / Complaint No. (As per Annexure)

…िशकायतकता१/Complainant Naresh Kadyan VERSUS बनाम CPIO:

University Grants Commission, …ঋितवादीगण /Respondents New Delhi Relevant dates emerging from the complaint:

Sl. Complaint Date of Date of Date of Date of Date of No. No. RTI CPIO’s First FAA’s Complaint Application Reply Appeal Order

1. 651526 25.08.2024 20.09.2024 Nil Not on Nil record

2. 649621 24.08.2024 18.10.2024 Nil Not on Nil record

3. 648933 24.08.2024 20.09.2024 Nil Not on Nil record

4. 648334 29.08.2024 20.09.2024 Nil Not on Nil record

5. 634273 25.05.2024 04.06.2024 04.06.2024 07.06.2024 Nil 6. 624317 21.03.2024 23.04.2024 Nil Not on Nil record

7. 619294 11.11.2023 Not on 29.12.2023 15.01.2024 Nil record Note – The above-mentioned complaints have been clubbed together for decision as these are based on similar RTI Applications.

Date of Hearing: 09.04.2025 Date of Decision: 16.04.2025 CORAM:

Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R Complaint No. CIC/UGCOM/C/2024/651526

1. The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 25.08.2024 seeking information on the following points:

Supply complete details and information, related to various complaints with UGC, and all Enforcement agencies, proved no coordination among themselves, to prevent crime and fraud, cybercrime as well, related to

1) World Peace of United Nations University /

2) Commonwealth Vocational University /

3) California Public University /

4) National Virtual University /

5) Socrates Social Research University /

6) Thames International University/

7) Laughter Yoga University.

Supply present status of all complaints and action taken reports at UGC level, with complete details of FIR lodged by UGC, for the violation as stated in my complaints, even UGC circulars, to boost community policing as scouting with without gain.

1.1. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 20.09.2024 and the same is reproduced as under:-

You are informed that as per record the World Peace of United Nations University is not recognized by UGC under Section 2(f) or Section 3 of UGC Act, 1956. However, the matter under process of UGC.

1.2. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Complainant filed a First Appeal dated Nil alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading, which was not adjudicated by the Fist Appellate Authority.

1.3. Aggrieved with the non-receipt of FAA’s order, the Complainant approached the Commission with the instant Complaint dated Nil.

Complaint No. CIC/UGCOM/C/2024/649621

2. The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 24.08.2024 seeking information on the following points:

As per Section 2 and 3 of UGC Act, the above said claims are unconstitutional, illegal and cheating - fraud for gain and profit, complaint has been sent to UGC:

1) Supply complete details and provide copies of action taken on complaints received against Laughter Yoga University.

2) Supply all copies of affiliation, certificates, degree, awards, given by the Laughter Yoga University, 2010 onwards till date.

3) Supply bank details, people cheated, criminal proceedings against Laughter Yoga University.

4) Present status of Laughter Yoga University and courses offered, and completed, along with Alumni and complete list.

2.1. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 18.10.2024 and the same is reproduced as under:-

The name of Laughter Yoga University, Bangalore, is not appearing in the list of universities established as per Section 2(f) of UGC Act, 1956, as maintained by the UGC.

2.2. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Complainant filed a First Appeal dated Nil alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading, which was not adjudicated by the Fist Appellate Authority.

2.3. Aggrieved with the non-receipt of FAA’s order, the Complainant approached the Commission with the instant Complaint dated Nil.

C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top