SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9185

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Akshay Kumar Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
MCD – Respondent


के (cid:3)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:18), मुिनरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File Nos. : CIC/MCDND/A/2023/113656 &

CIC/MCDND/C/2023/628011 Akshay Kumar Malhotra .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant ….िशकायतकता(cid:18) /Complainant VERSUS बनाम PIO, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Keshav Puram Zone, A-1 Block, Keshav Puram, Delhi- 110035 ….(cid:30)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 09.04.2025 Date of Decision : 22.04.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari The above-mentioned second appeal/complaint are clubbed together as the Appellant/complainant is common and subject-matter is similar in nature and hence are being disposed of through a common order.

CIC/MCDND/A/2023/113656 Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 29.12.2022 CPIO replied on : Not on record First appeal filed on : 31.01.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : Not on record

2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 23.03.2023 Information sought:

The Appellant filed an RTI application (online) dated 29.12.2022 seeking the following information:

“1. Please inform me the details (names, addresses etc.) of all the "Animal Welfare Organiz

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top