Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Khushwant Singh Sethi, Information Commissioner
Piyali Datta – Appellant
Versus
Oil India Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for vacancy details and future notifications denied as not meeting the definition of information under s.2(f). (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. necessity of ensuring all parties receive hearing notices before proceeding with a decision. (Para 5) |
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 16-04-2025
CPIO replied on : 16-05-2025
First appeal filed on : 16-05-2025
First Appellate Authority’s order : 29-05-2025
2nd Appeal dated : 12-06-2025
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 16-04-2025 seeking the following information:
“1. What is the current vacancies in Senior Assistant I Grade VII (Accounts) cadre? 2. If yes, what is the current available vacancies in Senior Assistant I Grade VII (Accounts) cadre 3. What is the current vacancies in Junior Assistant Clerk cum Computer Operator cadre? 4. If yes, what is the current available vacancies in Junior Assistant Clerk cum Computer Operator cadre. 4. Will notification related to either point 1 or 2 be released in this financial year ?”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 16-05-2025 stating as under:
“1-4 There is no vacancy notification or newspaper adver
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
