CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Raj Kumar Goyal, Information Commissioner
S Srinivasa – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of the rti complaint and initial hearing details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. invalidity of rti requests sent to non-designated grievance email addresses. (Para 6) |
| 3. lack of statutory compliance under section 6(1) renders the complaint ab initio not maintainable. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
| Relevant dates emerging from the complaint: | ||
| RTI : 15.04.2024 | FA : Not on Record | Complaint : 12.11.2024 |
| CPIO : Not on record | FAO : Not on Record | Hearing : 19.05.2026 & 23.06.2026 |
1. The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 15.04.2024, before the CPIO, Election Commission of India, seeking information as under:
“Under the rti 6, 6(3)4(1)b law provide fallowing information records as per your laws.
1:- election code means applies works and not applied works in village to national level provide.
2:-elections chekup vehicles amount seized by all employees in India and as per your records provide.
3:-works done by ECI on all seized amount in checkups.
4:- election voters list provide in your jurisdiction published..cd/dvd/ pendrive
Please acknowledge receipt send me with action taken report send me..”
2. Upon non-receipt of a reply, the Complainant approached the Com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.