Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Swagat Das, Information Commissioner
G. S. Gangadharappa – Appellant
Versus
C.P.I.O, National Academy of Indian Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial request for candidate response sheets and subsequent administrative responses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. procedural verification of appeal service and respondent's contention regarding non-availability of records. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. limitation of appeal scope to the original rti application and factual verification of data dissemination. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. public authorities are not required to procure or create information not held in their records. (Para 10 , 11) |
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 09-08-2024
CPIO replied on : 06-09-2024
First appeal filed on : 10-09-2024
First Appellate Authority’s order : 09-10-2024
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 28-10-2024
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 09-08-2024 seeking the following information:
“1.Copy of the Response sheets of all the candidates appeared for the post of Assistant Works Manager/Mechanical/RWF/YNK, on 04/08/2024, in Bangalore centre.
2. Above information of all the candidates arranged in NAIR web site to all the candidates to make objections up to 17:00 hrs of 09/08/2024.”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 06-09-2024 stating
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
