Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Swagat Das, Information Commissioner
Jitendrakumar Manilal Patel – Appellant
Versus
C.P.I.O, Western Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of the rti application and appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. hearing submissions and respondent's defense regarding pay recalculation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. distinction between 'information' and 'explanation' under rti act. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. rti act is not a forum for grievance redressal. (Para 11 , 12) |
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 20-09-2024
CPIO replied on : 23-10-2024
First appeal filed on : 23-10-2024
First Appellate Authority’s order : 21-11-2024
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 03-12-2024
Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 20-09-2024 seeking the following information:
“1. As per the memorandum no. EM/773/1/ALL/Vol.II (Running) dated 24/08/2021, the revised pay is shown as 5300 for the period from 01/08/1999 to 31/01/2001. However, according to railway rules, the pay should be 5450 as of 01/08/2000, since my NIP was without any future effect. This is reflected in my service sheet and the senior goods promotion letter no. EM/839/5/11(REST) Rajkot dated 01/08/2000. Therefore, if we consider the pay to be 5450 on 01/08/2000, the next pay should be 5675 with the promotion increment ef
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
