CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation – Respondent
CIC/PAESO/A/2025/115497
##PAGE1##
के ኚ᭾ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ मागग, मुननरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
नई नि्ቤी, New Delhi – 110067
File No: CIC/PAESO/A/2025/115497
Rajesh Kumar .….अपीलक
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO : Petroleum and Explosive
Safety Organisation, Formerly- ….्ቚनर्वािीगण /RESPONDENT
Department of Explosives, Office of
Jt. Chief Controller of Explosives,
RTI Cell, A-Wing, IInd Floor,
Kendralaya, 63/4, Sanjay Place,
Agra-282002
Date of Hearing : 06-07-2026
Date of Decision : 06-07-2026
INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Khushwant Singh Sethi
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 24-03-2025
CPIO replied on : 30-04-2025
First appeal filed on : 25-04-2025
First Appellate Authority’s order : 06-05-2025
2 nd Appeal dated : 15-05-2025
CIC/PAESO/A/2025/115497 Page 1 of 5
1 / 6
##PAGE2##Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 24-03-2025 seeking the
following information:
“1-Please provide me very clear and complete information for not
cancelling the Explosive License No P-39962 issued in favor of IOCL
for a premises on which IOCL does not have rightful legal possession
as accepted by IOCL in its various letters (documentary evidences
already submitted) and as mandated by RULE 152 of Petroleum
Rules 2002 and I am joint owner of the subject premises as per Court
order dated 30/08/1996 and DECREE issued
thereunder(documentary evidences already submitted) and
accepted by Dealer without my permission.
2- Please provide me very clear and complete information for not
taking any action against IOCL for submitting wrong DECELARATION
for the said license.
3- Please provide me very clear and complete information about the
role of Licensing authority and Explosive Deptt for misleading the
subject matter about the lease deed which has already been
extinguished by Competent Court of Law and it was never in favor
of IOCL.”
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 30-04-2025 stating as
under:
“कृपया उपरोक्त विषयक अपने आरटीआई आिेदन ददनाांक 24/03/2025
23/04/2025
जोककइसकायाालयमेंददनाकां को्ቚाप्तहुआकासांदर्ा्ቇहण
करनेकाकष्टकरें।
CIC/PAESO/A/2025/115497 Page 2 of 5
2 / 6
##PAGE3##उक्तके सांबांधआपकोसूचितककयाजाताहैककआपके द्िाराएकही
-
अनु्ሺप्प्तविशेषके सांबांधमेंबारबारजानकारी्ቚाप्तकरनेहेतुआिेदन
ककयाजारहाहैप्जससेइसकायाालयके कीमतीसमयएिांसांसाधनोंका
अपव्ययहोरहाहै।अतःआपकोसलाहदीजातीहैककआपपूिासूिनादेकर
इसकायाालयमेंउपप्थितहोकरसांबांचधतप्ቔािलीकाअिलोकनकरएक
ही बार में समथत िाांछित जानकारी ्ቚाप्त कर सकते हैं।”
3. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 25-04-2025.
The FAA vide its order dated 06-05-2025, held as under:
“PIO SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATIONS
AND PENAL ACTION NEED TO BE TAKEN”
4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Commission
with the instant Second Appeal.
Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:
The following were present:-
Appellant: Absent.
Respondent: Mr. Saurabh Sakhya, Deputy Controller of Explosives, attended
the hearing through video conference.
5. The Respondent submitted, that the appellant sought information
regarding not cancelling the Explosive License No P-39962, issued in favor of
IOCL etc. The respondent submitted, that the appellant sought the same
information multiple times, via multiple RTI applications and the information
was already provided to him. Further, an opportunity of inspection was offered
CIC/PAESO/A/2025/115497 Page 3 of 5
3 / 6
##PAGE4##to him vide letter dated 30.04.2025 to view the relevant records, and obtain all
the information he desires in one sitting.
6. The Commission queried the respondent, as to whether the appellant has
availed the opportunity of inspection. To this, the respondent submitted, that
he has not availed the opportunity of inspection.
7. Written submission dated 03.07.2026, filed by the respondent is taken on
record.
Decision:
8. The Commission, after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the
case, hearing the respondent and perusal of the records, observes that the
Commission has already heard similar RTI applications filed by the instant
appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.