SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 8356

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
RISHI KAPOOR ANAND – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) – Respondent
CIC/IOCLD/A/2025/115418



##PAGE1##

के ኚ᭾ीय सूचना आयोग

Central Information Commission

बाबा गंगनाथ मागग, मुननरका

Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka

नई नि्ቤी, New Delhi – 110067

File No: CIC/IOCLD/A/2025/115418

Rishi Kapoor Anand .….अपीलक

VERSUS

बनाम

CPIO : Indian Oil Corporation

Limited, (Marketing Division), O/o ….्ቚनर्वािीगण /RESPONDENT

Chief General Manager (LPG)-

UPSO-I, Lucknow/ RTI, U.P. State

Office-1: Indian Oil Bhavan, TC

39-V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti

Nagar, Lucknow-226 010.

Date of Hearing : 06-07-2026

Date of Decision : 06-07-2026

INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Khushwant Singh Sethi

Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

RTI application filed on : 28-12-2024

CPIO replied on : 04-02-2025

First appeal filed on : 27-02-2025

First Appellate Authority’s order : 17-03-2025

2 nd Appeal dated : 28-05-2025

CIC/IOCLD/A/2025/115418 Page 1 of 5

1 / 6

##PAGE2##

Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 28-12-2024 for seeking the

information and the CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 04-02-2025. The

Information sought and reply given in this regard is as under:

“ -1)

्ቚश्न गोरखपुरएररयाऑफिसके कायय्ቌे्ቔके तहतकुलफकतनी

. . , ?

एलपीजीडि቗ኚरीब्यूटरशिपहैपूरीसूचीदें

-1)

उ्ቈर अवगतफकयाजाताहैफकगोरखपुरइंण्िने मण्िलीयकयायलयके

266 (

अंतगतय इण्िने एलपीजीकीकुल गैसएजेन्सीसंचाशलतहैं। जजसकी

)

सूचीसंलग्नहै।

-2)

्ቚश्न गोरखपुरएररयाऑफिसके कायय्ቌ्ቔे के तहतकोटाके अतं गतय

AC/ST/OBC/GEN, ?

केफकतनीएजजेन्सयोंहैपूरावववरणदें

-2) 1

उ्ቈर कृपयाउ्ቈरसंख्या मेंसंलग्नसूचीकासंदर्यलें।

-3) 1 2022 20

्ቚश्न गोरखपुरएररयाऑफिसकेअंतगतय अ्ቚैल से ददसम्बर

2024 QRC

तकफकतनीएजजेन्सयोंका टीमद्वाराजांचफकयागयाऔर

- -

फकसफकसएजेन्सीपरक्याक्याकायवय ाहीहुयीएवंफकतनाफकतनािाइन

?

याजुमायनालगायागयाइसकापूरावववरणदें

-3) 1 2022 20 2024

उ्ቈर अवगतफकयाजाताहैफक अ्ቚैल से ददसम्बर तक

QRC

टीमकेद्वारागोरखपुरइंण्िने मण्िलीयकयायलयकेअतं गतय संचाशलत

21 QRC

कुल गैसएजेजन्सयोंपरजांचकीगयीहै।इसकेअततररक्तआपने

टीमके द्वाराफकसगसै एजेन्सीपरक्याकायवय ाहीकीगईएवंउनपर

-

फकतनाफकनताजुमायनालगायागयाकेसंबंधमेंजानकारीमांगीहै।आपके

CIC/IOCLD/A/2025/115418 Page 2 of 5

2 / 6

##PAGE3##

द्वारावांतितजानकारीकॉपोरेिनकीनीततएवंतनयमोंके बारे में

व्यापाररकएवंव्यवसातयकसूचनाहैजजसकोउपलब्धकरायेजानेसेततृ ीय

/

प्ቌववतरककी्ቚतत቗ኚपधायकोनुकसानपहुंचसकताहैपहुंचगे ा।अतःयह

,

सूचनाउपलब्धनहींकरायीजासकतीहै।इस्ቚकारकीसूचनाके शलए

2005 8 (1) ( )

सूचनाअधधकारअधधतनयम कीधारा िीकेअन्तगतय िूट्ቚद्ቈ

है।

2. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 27-02-2025.

The FAA vide its order dated 17-03-2025, upheld the reply given by the CPIO.

3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, Appellant approached the Commission

with the instant Second Appeal.

Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:

The following were present:-

Appellant: Absent.

Respondent: Mr. Manick Biswas, DGM (LPG Sales), attended the hearing

through video conference.

4. The Respondent submitted, that the appellant sought information

regarding the total number of LPG distributorships under the jurisdiction of

Gorakhpur Area Office; their complete list; the total number of agencies that

were investigated by the QRC team; action taken against the agencies and fine

or penalty imposed on them etc. The respondent submitted, that they had

provided the numerical figures, with respect to the total number of LPG

distributorships under the jurisdiction of Gorakhpur Area Office; their complete

list and the total number of agencies that were inspected by QRC team from 1st

April, 2022, to 20th December, 2024, to the appellant, vide letter dated

CIC/IOCLD/A/2025/115418 Page 3 of 5

3 / 6

##PAGE4##

04.02.2025. The respondent further submitted, that the information regarding

the QRC team’s action against each gas agency, and the amount of fines

imposed is commercially confidential and business information, regarding the

Corporation’s policies and regulations, the disclosure of the same may harm the

competitiveness of third-party distributors. Hence, the same is exempted U/s

8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, 2005.

5. Written submission dated 26.06.2026, filed by the respondent is taken on

record.

Decision:

6. The Commission, after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the

case, hearing the respondent and perusal of the records, obs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top