2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9467
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
A. DJIVANANDAME – Appellant
Versus
UT of Puducherry – Respondent
CIC/UTPON/A/2025/114519
##PAGE1##
CIC/UTPON/A/2025/114519
केÛ(cid:289)(cid:547)य सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ
माग,
(cid:91) मु(cid:467)नरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
नई (cid:465)दãल(cid:547), New Delhi – 110067
(cid:622)(cid:874)वतीय अपील सÉं या / Second Appeal No. CIC/UTPON/A/2025/114519
A. Djivanandame
… अपीलकता/(cid:91) Appellant
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO: Bharathidasan
Government College for
…(cid:292)(cid:467)तवाद(cid:547)गण/Respondents
Women (Govt. of
Puducherry),
Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:
RTI : 25.11.2024 FA : 24.12.2024 SA : 06.03.2025
CPIO : 20.12.2024 FAO : 22.01.2025 Hearing : 13.07.2026
Date of Decision: 15.07.2026
CORAM:
Hon’ble Commissioner
Shri P R Ramesh
O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 25.11.2024 seeking information on
the following points:
1. When Mr. Sasikanthan Das was serving as Principal of Bharadhidasan
Govt. College for women Puducherry, which staff installed a secret camera in
the changing room of the students for the art programme (At the College
Anniversary) being held in the college, please provide their name and
designation, what action did you take as a result of this.
Page 1 of 9
1 / 10
##PAGE2##CIC/UTPON/A/2025/114519
2. Please provide the date, month and year of the incident whether a committee
was farmed in the college to investigate the matter. please provide name and
designation of the committee chairman, members and legal advisor.
3. Provide the name of the office in which the accused is currently working and
his current designation. In which police station did the college administration
file a complaint, provide the name and designation of the registered police
officer and provide copy of the complaint letter…etc.
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 20.12.2024 and the same is reproduced as under
:-
1 to 3 the information sought for pertains to matter which is sensitive and liable to
be held in fiduciary capacity. As such, it is exempted for disclosure under section
8(1)(e) apart from section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005 pertaining to third person.
3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First
Appeal dated 24.12.2024 alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false
and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 22.01.2025 upheld the reply given by the
CPIO.
13. It is as clear as crystal that when the respondent has categorically stated that
the information sought for is not available with the public authority, the appellant
cannot have any grievance that he is entitled to obtain such information. Of
course, much could have been avoided had the respondent has provided proper
information in the first instance itself.
When the respondent has sought pardon, it is only befitting to condone the lapse
and not to precipitate any further.
14. Based on the revised information provided by the respondent, the first appeal
stands disposed.
Page 2 of 9
2 / 10
##PAGE3##CIC/UTPON/A/2025/114519
6. The appellant has submitted that the denial of information amounts to shielding
the erring officials and hence the information sought may be provided to the
appellant.
7. As a matter of fact, on thorough and complete enquiry made from the concerned
sections, Heads of Departments of the College and legal cell, students grievience
cell, Internal complaint Committee, this respondent came to know that no such
incident was ever reported and no record is available in the College in this
regard. As a matter of fact, this respondent should have provided only such reply
to the applicant/appellant. But due to sheer inadvertence and inadequate
experience in dealing matters under the Act, the respondent has given a reply
stating that the information sought for would fall under exemption clauses of
Section 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) of the Act.
8. When such information was not available with the public authority, the question
of seeking exemption does not arise at all. The respondent. stands corrected on the
reply furnished by her.
9. This respondent assures that she would be more careful and cautious in
providing information i