SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9970

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Information Commissioner
Sushil Dinanath Ajgaonkar – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Employees Provident Fund Organisation – Respondent
Second Appeal No. CIC/EPFOG/A/2025/645633



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Ganesh Prasad Arote

A second appeal under the RTI Act may be closed and disposed of if the appellant formally requests withdrawal upon receiving the sought information.

Headnote:(A) Right to Information - Withdrawal of Appeal - Where the appellant informs the Commission that the requested information has been received and the grievance has been redressed, the second appeal is liable to be closed as withdrawn. (Para 4, 8)

Table of Content
1. initial filing of rti application and subsequent failure of cpio to respond. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. formal withdrawal of appeal due to receipt of information. (Para 4)
3. hearing proceedings and confirmation of information delivery. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. disposal of appeal based on appellant's withdrawal request. (Para 8)

Relevant facts emerging from Second Appeal/Complaint:

RTI application filed on 30/06/2025
CPIO replied on Not on Record
First appeal filed on 04/08/2025
FAA’s order dated Not on Record
Second Appeal dated 29/09/2025

Information sought:

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 30/06/2025 before the CPIO, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Mumbai seeking the following information:

“1. Kindly indicate period i.e. number of years EPFO maintains member related information including contributions, claims and withdrawals. Is the period different for establishments which are PF: UNEXEMPTED, PENSION: UNEXEMPTED and now their Working Status is CLOSED/ALL MEMBER EXCLUDED. Is the period different if the records were maintained manually ie not computerized/digitized?

2. Kindly furnish following information pertaining to Establishment ID MHBAN001596600A, PF account no. MH/15966-A/245.

a) Date of Joining and Exit

b) Provident Fund Contribution, Interest Credited, Claims if any along with settlement status, Date and Amount

c) Family Pension Scheme Contribution, Interest Credited, Claims if any along with claim settlement status, Date and Amount

d) Current status of account

e) Pensionable Service corresponding to service period of this account

3. Kindly furnish following information pertaining to Establishment ID KDMAL001596600G, PF account no. MH/15966-G/27.

a) Date of Joining and Exit

b) Provident Fund Contribution, Interest Credited, Claims if any along with settlement status, Date and Amount

c) Family Pension Scheme Contribution, Interest Credited, Claims if any along with claim settlement status, Date and Amount

d) Current status of account

e) Pensionable Service corresponding to service period of this account.”

2. The CPIO has not furnished any reply to the appellant as per record.

3. Aggrieved and dissatisfied, the appellant filed the First Appeal with the first Appellate Authority. The First Appellate Authority order is not on record.

4. Being aggrieved, the Appellant filed the Instant Second Appeal on 29/09/2025.

The Appellant vide letter dated 13/07/2026 withdrew his second appeal stating,

“Subject: Request for withdrawal of Second Appeal – File No. CIC/EPFOG/A/2025/645633

Respected Sir/Madam,

I have filed the second appeal under reference against the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), which is currently scheduled for a hearing. I wish to inform the Hon’ble Commission that subsequent to the filing of this second appeal, the First Appellate Authority (FAA) responded to my grievance. Consequently, through follow-up actions over the past year, I have received information requested in my original RTI application in parts. AnnexureK is the latest artifact received on 19-June-2026. It addresses Question 3e of my RTI application and is attached along with. Since the core grievance of my RTI application stands fully redressed, the scheduled hearing is no longer required. I respectfully request the Hon’ble Commission to treat this Second Appeal as withdrawn and closed, and to condone my absence from the upcoming hearing.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Yours faithfully,

Sushil Ajgaonkar”

5. Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:

The following were present:-

Appellant: Absent

Respondent: Mr. Ganesh Prasad Arote CPIO participated in the hearing on VC

6. The Appellant has not availed the opportunity to participate in the hearing despite due notice of hearing.

7. The Respondent reiterates the facts of the case and further submits that the information on record has been provided.

DECISION

8. The Commission notes that the Appellant vide letter dated 13/07/2026 withdrew his Second Appeal. Hence th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top